<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supporters of H.R. 1728: Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act Believe Borrowers Were Duped Into Bad Loans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lenderama.com/2009/05/18/supporters-hr-1728-mortgage-reform-antipredatory-lending-act-borrowers-duped-bad-loans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lenderama.com/2009/05/18/supporters-hr-1728-mortgage-reform-antipredatory-lending-act-borrowers-duped-bad-loans/</link>
	<description>The Original Mortgage Blog. Providing the Mortgage Industry with News and Information Since 2005.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BloodhoundBlog.com &#124; The End of No-Cost Mortgage Loans and Other HR 1728 Concerns &#124; National real estate marketing and technology blog &#124; Realtors and real estate, mortgage and investment news</title>
		<link>http://lenderama.com/2009/05/18/supporters-hr-1728-mortgage-reform-antipredatory-lending-act-borrowers-duped-bad-loans/comment-page-1/#comment-4292</link>
		<dc:creator>BloodhoundBlog.com &#124; The End of No-Cost Mortgage Loans and Other HR 1728 Concerns &#124; National real estate marketing and technology blog &#124; Realtors and real estate, mortgage and investment news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 16:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenderama.com/?p=2581#comment-4292</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve spent a significant amount of time reading, researching and writing about how mortgage originators can battleback against this new Mortgage Reform bill. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve spent a significant amount of time reading, researching and writing about how mortgage originators can battleback against this new Mortgage Reform bill. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Mortgage Helper</title>
		<link>http://lenderama.com/2009/05/18/supporters-hr-1728-mortgage-reform-antipredatory-lending-act-borrowers-duped-bad-loans/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Mortgage Helper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenderama.com/?p=2581#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>will this Anti-Predatory Lending Act help the borrowers in any way? If a borrower is in dire need of money he will borrow money even from a predatory lender. Is not it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will this Anti-Predatory Lending Act help the borrowers in any way? If a borrower is in dire need of money he will borrow money even from a predatory lender. Is not it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Stabile Bergen County</title>
		<link>http://lenderama.com/2009/05/18/supporters-hr-1728-mortgage-reform-antipredatory-lending-act-borrowers-duped-bad-loans/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stabile Bergen County</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenderama.com/?p=2581#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>Sept 30 1999 New York Times, I don&#039;t remember the reporter, however the article is available. It spoke of President Clinton&#039;s desire that all people should get a home loan. It spoke of how he asked and pressured Fannie and Freddie to open up their standards to less qualified borrowers. This was the beginning of the great society version of how we should do lending. It all started there and further in 2004 when congress repealed the restrictions on leveraging. Yes the bankers knew better, but they were working with and competing with the government agencies, Fannie and Freddie. Wall Street stepped up to a low interest rate environment that had little profit potential and blew it up. This was all at the desire of Barney Frank and company, to expand credit standards and loosen requirements. The notion however to lend without prudence, was the lack of skin in the game. This has now changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sept 30 1999 New York Times, I don&#39;t remember the reporter, however the article is available. It spoke of President Clinton&#39;s desire that all people should get a home loan. It spoke of how he asked and pressured Fannie and Freddie to open up their standards to less qualified borrowers. This was the beginning of the great society version of how we should do lending. It all started there and further in 2004 when congress repealed the restrictions on leveraging. Yes the bankers knew better, but they were working with and competing with the government agencies, Fannie and Freddie. Wall Street stepped up to a low interest rate environment that had little profit potential and blew it up. This was all at the desire of Barney Frank and company, to expand credit standards and loosen requirements. The notion however to lend without prudence, was the lack of skin in the game. This has now changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Madsen</title>
		<link>http://lenderama.com/2009/05/18/supporters-hr-1728-mortgage-reform-antipredatory-lending-act-borrowers-duped-bad-loans/comment-page-1/#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Madsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenderama.com/?p=2581#comment-4289</guid>
		<description>Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Mortgage Loan</title>
		<link>http://lenderama.com/2009/05/18/supporters-hr-1728-mortgage-reform-antipredatory-lending-act-borrowers-duped-bad-loans/comment-page-1/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Mortgage Loan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lenderama.com/?p=2581#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>Mortgage Originators have been giving a black eye since the boom years.  I agree that some of it is deserved but in my opinion to completely swing one way or the other is always a mistake.  You make consumers into lemmings that blindly walk into a situation that is absolutely disgusting.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although the mortgage originator or any other professional involved in the purchase of your home/refinance etc has a fiduciary responsibility to act in your best interest, the buck doesn&#039;t stop there.  Consumers are ultimately responsible for their own financial well being.  Yes its true some were duped into loans that weren&#039;t to their own benefit, most knowingly signed on loan documents knowing full well they were taking a gamble with the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mortgage Originators have been giving a black eye since the boom years.  I agree that some of it is deserved but in my opinion to completely swing one way or the other is always a mistake.  You make consumers into lemmings that blindly walk into a situation that is absolutely disgusting.  </p>
<p>Although the mortgage originator or any other professional involved in the purchase of your home/refinance etc has a fiduciary responsibility to act in your best interest, the buck doesn&#39;t stop there.  Consumers are ultimately responsible for their own financial well being.  Yes its true some were duped into loans that weren&#39;t to their own benefit, most knowingly signed on loan documents knowing full well they were taking a gamble with the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
