From the category archives:

Inman

How much is your share of the U.S. money supply?

by Wade Young on January 7, 2009

how-much-is-your-share-of-the-us-money-supply

I have always wondered how big my bag of loot would be if we divvied up every single dollar of United States currency equally among the citizens. I’m not talking about dollar bills in circulation; I’m referring to the entire money supply. Before we get to the final number, I will point out that one million dollars presented to you in $100 dollar bills would weigh approximately 22 pounds. Would you need a wheelbarrow to cart away your share of the United States money supply? Let’s find out.

If you have ever taken an economics class, the terms M1, M2, and M3 are probably vaguely familiar. These terms represent the U.S. money supply — or money stock — as it is called by economists and the Federal Reserve. The total of M1, M2, and M3 purportedly represents the total amount of money available in the economy.

M1

M1 refers to the most liquid type of money. It composes currency in circulation, demand deposits, and traveler’s checks. It’s basically the kind of money that you can access to buy goods and services or pay a debt.

M2

M2 (M1 + M2) consists of all of M1, time deposits less than $100k, savings deposits, and balances in money market accounts for individuals.

M3

M3 (M2 + M3) includes all of M2 (which includes M1), large time deposits (over $100k), institutional money market funds, repurchase liabilities issued by depository institutions, and Eurodollars (not to be confused with Euros). Eurodollars are U.S. dollars held on deposit with a bank abroad.

In other words, M1 and M2 reflect the mom and pop side of the economy whereas M3 includes the big boys, financially speaking.

As of March 2006, the Federal Reserve stopped reporting M3. The Federal Reserve said that “the costs of collecting the underlying data and publishing M3 outweigh the benefits.” That means they are trying to save money! I think it is far more likely that they don’t want us to see M3. They further state that M3 “has not played a role in the monetary policy process for many years.”

I find that to be a bit fishy. The total amount of money in our system would have to be meaningful, in which case the Federal Reserve has to be calculating it. However, they are choosing not to report it. I guess we are left to ponder why. If they stopped reporting M1, they could easily say that M1 can be found in M2. Likewise, if they stopped reporting M2, they could say that the data was included in M3. But where are we to find the M3 data? Nowhere. I think that’s the point.

Because the current M3 — or total U.S. money supply — numbers are unavailable, we’ll have to use the last published numbers (March 2006) to get a ballpark idea of how much you and I would put in our pockets if we divvied up the U.S. money supply. As of early 2006, the United States money stock was as follows:

M1                          $1.4 trillion

M2  (M1 + M2)      $6.7 trillion

M3  (M2 + M3)      $10.3 trillion

If we split the $10.3 trillion dollar M3 supply evenly among 305 million Americans, each of us would walk away with about $33,770. Of course, we probably wouldn’t cut checks to babies, so let’s run the numbers by household, assuming roughly 112 million United States households. That number comes to $91,964.

I almost can’t believe the numbers. If we divvied up the entire U.S. money supply, my family walks away with a measly $92k. Something must be missing, as that number is incredibly low. Most folks I know couldn’t even pay off their house and cars for $92k, much less have anything left over to buy necessities.

It turns out that the M1, M2, and M3 figures are flawed. For starters, M1 includes traveler’s checks. When you cash a traveler’s check, money is transferred from American Express, for example, to the holder of the check, but the amount of money in the economy does not change. Including traveler’s checks seems like double-counting to me.

Federal government deposits and Federal Reserve deposits are also excluded from the money supply. If the federal government collects $100 billion in taxes, $100 billion effectively leaves the money supply as it is transferred from M1 (our checking accounts) to the government’s account, which isn’t counted in the money supply. Excluding government and Federal Reserve deposits (which I’m assuming are a lot bigger than yours and mine) does certainly skew the money supply numbers.

As it turns out, the government doesn’t actually tell us how much money is in the United States money supply. It’s simply not reported. Too bad, as I was really looking forward to divvying it up and getting out of debt Dave Ramsey style.

What gives the U.S. dollar its value? The only thing that gives value to the U.S. dollar is the Federal Reserve’s ability to keep the currency stable. Deliberately hiding M3 isn’t exactly bolstering my confidence in the Federal Reserve.

by Wade Young

Mortgage Industry Professionals. Like what you see?
SUBSCRIBE for free by RSS or email, and never miss a post!

{ 0 comments }

Out of town to promote a new project

by Todd Carpenter on January 6, 2009

Social Media Training Camp launches this morning. We’ll be in New York at RE BarCamp and Inman Connect to launch it. I’ve teemed up with Mariana Wagner, Kelley Koehler, and Ginger Wilcox to put together a training bootcamp for sales and marketing professionals who want to adopt this medium. More details are coming, but for now, I have a plane to catch!

{ 0 comments }

Welcome to 2009! Now Get to Work!

by Chad Weber on January 6, 2009

Welcome to 2009! As I struggle to retrain my tiny brain to write 09 instead of 08, I eagerly look forward to what this year will bring! I hope all of you are putting together a solid marketing plan. I know it seems to be the same song and dance year after year, but what are you going to do differently this year?

I want you to take some time and examine your current situation and ask a tough question. That question is “Why?” Why am I in this situation? What behaviors, habits, and events have worked together to land me into my current situation - be it good or bad?

Straight answers work best here, even if it’s not what you want to hear or admit. I’ll give you a little peak into a few of these “self chats” I’ve had with myself. I put everything on paper or into files on my PC, so I can always go back and find my habits. Here’s one from a few years back:

Negative habits:

- Too many activities going at once

- Find it difficult to say ‘no’ to new ventures

- Organization of files

- Too much time spent online

- Checking and responding to non-critical emails

- Work too many hours

Those were the negatives I found in myself. (Stop laughing at my admission that I work too much!) I’m sure this is by no means a conclusive list. haha - But I had to come to terms with the fact that those seemingly small issues were working together to limit my income and productivity. Here were the positives I came up with:

- Take action quickly

- Not afraid of cold calls or prospecting

- Creative with marketing and sales approach

- Proficient with online marketing

- Straight forward with prospects

Now I had to find a way to enhance my positives and minimize my negatives. Of course when doing this exercise I expanded on each item so that all the facts were on the table staring me in the face. Once you’ve identified your positives and negatives, you will be better equipped to structure your marketing plan for 09.

It is of vital importance that your plan for 09 addresses your negative attributes/habits or else you’ll simply repeat 08 as the same mistakes are made over and over again. Been there done that…

Make it a great year!

CW - Loan Officer Marketing Lab

Loan Officer 2.0 - Dominating the Search Engines

{ 1 comment }

Mortgage Market Update

by Robert D. Ashby on January 5, 2009

Out with the old and in with the new, at least that is how the calendar looks as we said so long to 2008 and welcome in 2009.  Mortgage bonds did not receive a very warm welcome, however, closing down the first day of trading in the new year.  Unlike the Christmas week, this week was quite volatile to say the least, bringing back some not-so-fond memories.

Last week was a light data week along with it being a shortened trading week.  Nevertheless, it was volatile every day with most days ending opposite of where they began in the morning, including Friday, which was quite significant in that the ISM Index was released and it was the day after the Fed reaffirmed it would be buying up about $500 billion in mortgage backed securities. 

The week started off with the Israelis attacks on Hamas and that brought uncertainty about oil supply and resulted in oil prices climbing.  GMAC got their $6 billion from the Treasury, ensuring the government will do whatever it takes to bail out the big companies facing bankruptcy in the current economy.  As the data flowed, we saw Chicago PMI beat expectations, followed by Consumer Confidence missing by a long shot.  Even the ISM Index came in below expectations and marked a dismally performing economy.  But in the end, not even the Fed could prevent mortgage rates from ticking slightly higher.

As we get started the first full week of trading in 2009, where are mortgage rates going to go?  We are again going to be light on data as the week gets started, but we will end the week with a bang, the monthly Jobs Jamboree.  Here is the breakdown of data scheduled:

  • Monday:  No data
  • Tuesday:  ISM Services Index (10:00), FOMC Minutes (2:00)
  • Wednesday:  Crude Inventories (10:30)
  • Thursday:  Initial Jobless Claims (8:30)
  • Friday:  Non-farm Payrolls (8:30), Unemployment Rate (8:30), Hourly Earnings (8:30), Average Work Week (8:30)

As the week starts, news and technical factors will be in control, so let’s take a look at the technical indications.  Mortgage backed securities continue to remain in a sideways pattern, sitting just below their 10-day moving average and with their 25-day moving average coming up to meet them.  Stochastic indications have finally retreated and are offering mortgage bonds some room to move higher again, but it still appears that they lack the motivation to break higher than their current trading range.

News has already hit the airwaves that a new $1 trillion stimulus package will be on Barack Obama’s desk by mid February.  The unending spending of our government to prolong the inevitable will be met with dire consequences in all likelihood.  For my take, you can read the following two posts:

Mortgage Rates Continue to Climb, Reach Double Digits
US Inflation Approaches 20%

What I am expecting this week regarding mortgage rates is that they will likely tick down slightly, but unless they can muster some real strength, I highly doubt they will drop significantly.  Even if they break lower than their current trading range, with the Fed being the principal buyer, that “mortgage rate bubble” may grow too big and pop soon, and lenders will likely be hedging so pricing will not improve significantly either.

(Updated as I overlooked Tuesday’s data and added it in)

{ 1 comment }

FHA Short Sales

by Paul on January 1, 2009

fha-short-sales

Hello Lenderamons & Welcome to 2009!  Haven’t posted in a while, so I thought I’d start off the New Year to say Hi and let you know that I am alive and well, and for those friends of mine reading who’re still in the mortgage and real estate business, congrats!  With mortgage rates at a 37-year low there are plenty of folks to refi!  Of course, with lower appraised values, think FHA and VA streamlines because no appraisal is required on either program.  And speaking of values dropping, I have two words for you: Short Sales!  No, three-words: FHA Short Sales! 
                                

Ok, let’s get serious here.  Last week, the Dept of HUD published Mortgagee Letter 2008-43 which details the new procedures for the FHA Pre-Foreclosure sale.  The PFS is what FHA calls their Short Sale and if a seller is shorting an FHA loan, then here’s what you need to know.

>>They removed the calculation that required the property to appraise for at least 63% of the indebtedness (this is helpful because many properties have dropped below 37% of the mortgage balance).

>>HUD used to accept 82% of the appraised value as their net - now it is 88% if it sells within 30-days marketing time, 86% if it sells in 60-days, and 84% after 60 days.

>>Prior to ML 2008-43, HUD would pay zero buyer closing costs on an FHA short sale, now they will pay 1% of buyer’s closing costs if the new buyer is obtaining FHA financing. 

>>They’ve increased the amount allowable to discharge junior liens up to $2,500.  

>>FHA allows the seller to walk away with up to a $1,000 check at closing

Before I sign off here, I’d like to make a comment that IMO there has never been a time in the real estate industry where it has been so important to know your trade.  I’ll also add that there has never been a time when knowing the answers has been so satisfying.  I hope everyone is constantly learning and applying what they can to help the folks in your real estate locale and earn a profit in the process.  If it was easy, everyone could do it.  Since it’s not, the job is yours.

Paul Buys Florida Short Sales

{ 3 comments }